
Organizations evaluating Palantir alternatives often ask similar questions about products, costs, and the competitive landscape. Below you’ll find clear, skimmable answers — plus where DataWalk fits.
Palantir Technologies is a global leader in data, analytics & AI, offering robust software solutions and services tailored to both governmental and commercial sectors. Among its flagship products are Palantir Foundry and Palantir Gotham, each designed for distinct use cases, with Apollo and AIP recently introduced as complementary platforms.
While Palantir maintains a very strong position in defense, intelligence, and large government programs, a growing set of competitors are offering alternative solutions, often with different cost structures and more flexible implementation models. Let’s explore these Palantir competitors and understand why platforms like DataWalk are gaining traction as viable alternatives.

Palantir Gotham is an operating system for global decision‑making widely used by governmental, law enforcement, and military agencies for tasks like intelligence analysis, law enforcement investigations, national security, and battlefield operations. Gotham’s ability to integrate massive amounts of structured and unstructured data into a unified model makes it a critical tool for organizations managing complex investigative workflows.
Although primarily deployed in government and defense settings, Gotham has also been used in a handful of commercial projects, mainly in banking and financial services. Gotham has become a go‑to solution for large agencies requiring robust analytics capabilities, but its high costs and customization demands have opened the door for competitors offering similar features with greater flexibility and affordability.
Palantir’s own price list shows that an annual Gotham license for a single server core costs about US $88,171, with annual support and maintenance of around US $28,722 per core(1). Projects typically require many cores and extensive professional services, so deployments can run into tens or hundreds of millions of dollars. Palantir’s government contracts illustrate the scale: a five‑year expansion of the Army’s Project Maven was valued at US $480 million(2) and a modernization of the Army’s Distributed Common Ground System awarded to Palantir and BAE reached US $823 million(3).
When it comes to investigative analytics, Palantir's Gotham has historically competed with custom-built solutions from integrators and tools like Harris i2, SAS Visual Investigator, BAE Systems NetReveal, and others. These vendors provide link analysis and intelligence workflows that provide a subset of Gotham's capabilities. DataWalk frequently emerges as a leading alternative in this space because it delivers comparable large-scale data integration and investigation-oriented tools at a significantly lower cost.
Today, however, Palantir is increasingly positioning Gotham as a broader operations system or battlefield operating system. This shifts the competitive landscape, making it harder to define. For investigative analytics, the competitors mentioned above remain relevant. But for defense and operations, competition instead comes from large-scale command, control, and intelligence platforms custom-built by major defense contractors, such as Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and Raytheon. The definition of "competition" therefore strongly depends on the specific use case.
It's also worth noting that when analyzing open-source or internet sources, you may encounter additional solutions that market themselves as "Palantir alternatives." Many of these are:
Examples across these categories include Harris i2 Analyst’s Notebook, Siren, Linkurious and some other OSINT, Crypto and search-based solutions that might be considered as supplemental. While powerful in their domains, they are generally not enterprise-class alternatives to Palantir Gotham, but rather focused point solutions or complementary technologies.
Palantir Foundry is a data management and analytics platform designed to address the complex challenges of integrating, organizing and analyzing massive amounts of data. Foundry stands out for its ability to transform raw data into actionable insights by creating an ontology‑driven architecture. This architecture unifies disparate datasets into a shared language, allowing organizations to align their data with their operational workflows.
Foundry is positioned as a platform to build custom applications. The cost of Foundry reflects this flexibility: a Forrester Total Economic Impact study commissioned by Palantir found that a composite global enterprise incurred about US $82.1 million over three years(4) in Foundry software licenses, associated cloud costs and Palantir professional services. In practice, individual contracts vary widely but often involve tens of millions of dollars for software and services, while major public contracts for Palantir’s platform have topped hundreds of millions.
In the broader data-platform market, Palantir Foundry is often compared with Databricks, Snowflake, AWS Lake Formation, Google Cloud, Microsoft Fabric (Azure Synapse), Informatica, Alteryx, and SAS. These platforms provide data integration, ontology building, and analytics capabilities that overlap with Foundry’s features. However, these platforms generally favor analytics-centric workloads, while Palantir is typically used for real-time operational workloads and analysis, offering bidirectional integration with source systems. Another core differentiator is Foundry’s domain-specific, out-of-the-box ontologies. While the vendors listed above provide robust tools for building ontologies, they rarely deliver pre-built, domain-focused ontologies, which are central to Foundry’s positioning as an ontology-driven data integration and analysis platform.
Because of these distinctions, it’s difficult to capture all possible alternatives in a single framing. In the context of pure data integration and analytics platforms, the vendors mentioned above remain the most relevant competitors.
Palantir Apollo is a platform for managing deployment and operations of Palantir’s software (including Gotham and Foundry). It is designed to automate software updates, compliance and scaling across environments.
Apollo uses a hub‑and‑spoke architecture: hub environments receive information and telemetry about spoke environments and issue plans to make changes, while each spoke reports information and telemetry back to the hub. Palantir’s documentation notes that before announcing a platform change, telemetry is written to identify impacted resources. This architecture facilitates automated updates but means customers must enable telemetry reporting; for organizations whose compliance or security policies prohibit sending operational telemetry outside their network, this requirement can be problematic.
Sovereignty note: Apollo’s update model relies on environment telemetry for orchestration. Many defense programs require no outbound connectivity from classified or air-gapped networks. Organizations with such constraints often prefer platforms that can be updated and governed without external telemetry or vendor-managed hubs.
Palantir AIP is a layer that integrates large language models and other AI tools with Palantir’s existing platforms. It can automate basic data tasks, such as importing datasets or summarizing information.
Basic features (e.g., dataset import and summarization) are available “out‑of‑the‑box,” but the documentation notes that more complex integrations and workflows generally require input from engineers or development teams, and user feedback suggests that many advanced integrations require direct assistance from Palantir engineers. AIP is interoperable with both Gotham and Foundry.
For the purposes of this document, we'll focus on the Intelligence Analysis and Investigations category — the space where DataWalk most directly competes with Palantir’s offering. Many organizations attempt to replicate Palantir's capability by stitching together a costly patchwork of vendors (data integration platforms, graph tools, visualization tools, etc.). DataWalk is notable as an off-the-shelf solution that provides this full-spectrum capability without the multi-vendor complexity and friction, offering both platform flexibility and investigation-oriented analytics at a significantly lower cost. Unlike generic data platforms, DataWalk is optimized for integrating and analyzing highly connected big data for applications in:
Deployment Modes (Defense/IC): Open networks, classified networks, and fully air-gapped environments — with no mandatory telemetry, no forward-deployed engineers, and full operational sovereignty on commodity hardware.
Within the commercial segment of this category, other notable competitors include SAS (specifically SAS Visual Investigator) and Quantexa. Both focus heavily on fraud, AML, and customer intelligence use cases, but unlike DataWalk, they do not extend meaningfully into defense, law enforcement, or national intelligence domains.
In this landscape, DataWalk stands out as the only hybrid “build and buy” alternative. It combines the affordability and speed of an off-the-shelf product with the extensibility of a true enterprise platform, designed for investigative and intelligence analysis across both commercial and government sectors.
When considering alternatives to Palantir Gotham and Foundry for intelligence data analysis and investigative use cases it's helpful to categorize them as follows:

Figure 1: Bullseye of Palantir alternatives and related data analysis tools for “finding bad guys” scenarios. DataWalk is the closest full-scale alternative. Inner rings represent platforms for large organizations, while the outermost ring shows point solutions that only have a niche scope. Vendors outside the bullseye are supplementary platforms, not true alternatives to Palantir.
Many Palantir competitors position themselves as alternatives to Palantir Gotham & Foundry but, in reality, fall far short. Some of these tools offer only a small fraction of Palantir's capabilities (e.g., search and visualization) and are only sufficient for meeting the basic requirements of smaller organizations.
However, when it comes to integrating many datasets or sources, cleaning data, performing complex analyses on millions/billions of records, automating processes, adhering to IT/compliance requirements or expanding the platform capabilities—like integrating your own LLMs or AI models—these solutions often fail to deliver. Their limited functionality makes them unsuitable for organizations with more demanding needs or large‑scale operations.
Some customers and system integrators develop bespoke solutions tailored to their unique needs as an alternative to Palantir Gotham and Foundry. While these custom-built systems can meet specific requirements, they often involve enormous development and maintenance costs—sometimes hundreds of millions of dollars—and take years to complete, with a very high risk of failure.
Additionally, several vendors deliver black‑box solutions where critical mechanisms are hidden and coded into the system. As a result, customers may not have full visibility into the rules and processes used to identify suspicious events, leaving them without complete control over how the system operates.
Palantir competitors in this category are enterprise-class software solutions that bridge the gap between solution and platform capabilities. DataWalk, a prime example of this category, demonstrates competitive breadth across multiple domains, including Graph Analytics, Intelligence Analysis, and Data Science Platforms.
These platforms offer:
Such a hybrid solution stands out by delivering similar features with greater flexibility and affordability. Its lower costs and the absence of custom development requirements make it an attractive choice for organizations looking for powerful, scalable and budget‑friendly alternatives to Palantir Gotham and Foundry.

Figure 2: DataWalk’s “Universe Viewer” — the visual representation of your ontology and knowledge graph.


Kamil Goral is adept at evaluating advanced analytical platforms, focusing on their technical capabilities, deployment efficiency, and overall economic impact. His expertise lies in identifying solutions that empower users with robust data fusion and link analysis tools while minimizing complexity and cost.
Contact